Posted in uncategorized, mobile by nicoB on October 5th, 2008
Google has just released his new Mobile OS called Android, and we can already see websites, magazines and mobile phones holders comparing Android to the iPhone OS.
What I can see (on the web, or just by speaking with friends) is a lot of disappointment : Android OS isn’t the iPhone OS killer.
Actually, Apple did a tremendous work with iPhone OS. It’s quick, reactive, ergonomic, easy to use… It’s hard to a new system (even designed by Google) to beat Apple.
Ok, it’s not as good as iPhone OS but let’s discuss some points :
1. iPhone OS is only for Mac mobile phone
There is a point that we mustn’t forget : iPhone OS will only run on a Mac mobile. And for the moment, only one mobile phone (if we consider that the iPhone 3G is only an upgrade of the iPhone) runs this OS.
2. Android is OpenSource
The big difficulty when designing an OS is running this OS in different hardwares from different builders.
And this is where Google is really strong : he provides a mobile OS that can run on multiple hardwares. This OS is quite good : efficient, reliable… And most important thing : Android is OpenSource. That means, every mobile builder (Sony Ericsson, Samsung, LG… ) can put Android on their mobile phones and modify the source.
Android may become the new standard OS for mobile phone. They can all have the same basic, and (surprise) Google is behind that.
3. Android Programs are written in Java
An other thing which is also really important, is that Android implements Dalvik (a java virtual machine). That means each application for Android is coded in Java. The community of Java developers is so huge, we can easily foresee an exponential increase of Android homemade programs (whereas when coding an iPhone application you must learn a specific language Cocoa).
Google has already provided all the tools to developp an Android program (an Android SDK, full API, eclipse plugin, debugger, tutorials… ).
So, disappointment or not?
Is Google Android a disappointment? If you strictly compare with the iPhone : the answer is YES. But if you look a bit further more on what Android is, what it provides, what is its future, Android is NOT a disappointment. Android may be the new standard OS for mobile phones. It might grow bigger and more efficient thanks to the help of an active community of opensource and java developers. In fact the real opponent of Android is not iPhone but Windows Mobile.

October 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
C’est clair qu’Androïd présente de sérieux avantages pour s’imposer sur un marché où Windows mobile régnait en maitre ! Mais c’est vrai que le lancement a déçu, de gros défaut de conception (qui pourront être corrigés par ceux qui développeront un OS un peu plus personnalisé), une réactivité qui n’est pas au rdv.
Du coup pour l’instant, d’un point de vue utilisateur, ça n’est pas assez attrayant ! et les développeurs viendrons au développement sur androïd seulement s’il y’a un nombre d’utilisateurs (et vice versa, les utilisateurs viennent sur un OS en fonction du nombre d’Aplication qu’on y trouve…
Le pari est donc lancé ! est-ce que l’open source remplacera Windows sur nos mobiles ? Et a quand l’installation d’Android sur ton HTC ^^ ?
Quand à l’iPhone c’est déjà un pari gagné, il y’a d’ores et déjà 3 fois plus d’iPhone que de mobile sous Windows mobile.
July 1st, 2009 at 8:48 pm
there is also a ton of existing java libraries that can be ported over with greater ease than other platforms…
i think android is great but i don’t really like the idea that most of the “built in” apps will be all google related…
at least it is open source and i can write my own software that connects to other services like yahoo msn etc…
i know i could do the same with and iphone and code my own apps that connect to those services but because apple are so closed and give me a bad vibe i just couldn’t be bothered…
+1 for open source…